In episode number 9 of GigaLaw’s YouTube masterclass on domain name disputes, Doug Isenberg discusses why and how a trademark owner can include multiple domain names in a single complaint under the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP).
Domain Dispute Masterclass Episode 8: Bad Faith
Domain Dispute Masterclass Episode 7: Rights or Legitimate Interests
Domain Dispute Masterclass Episode 6: Trademark Confusion
In episode number 6 of my YouTube masterclass on Domain Name Disputes, I discuss the "identical or confusingly similar" requirement of the first part of the three-part test under the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP). This requires a complainant to prove that the domain name at issue is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which it has rights.
Domain Dispute Masterclass Episode 5: Trademark Rights
Domain Dispute Masterclass Episode 4: How Much Does the UDRP Cost?
The third episode of Doug Isenberg’s masterclass on domain name disputes talks about financial issues under the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) and answers the question, “How much does the UDRP cost?” As the video explains, a UDRP complaint includes two costs: the filing fee and the legal fee.
Domain Name Dispute Masterclass Episode 3: How Long Does the UDRP Take?
The third episode of Doug Isenberg’s masterclass on domain name disputes talks about timing issues under the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) and answers the question, “How long does the UDRP take?” As explained in the video, the typical UDRP process lasts about two months from filing a complaint until reaching a decision and includes the seven stages.
Announcing 'Domain Name Disputes: A Masterclass by Doug Isenberg'
GigaLaw's Domain Dispute Digest, (Q2 2020): A 'Surge' in Domain Name Disputes
What the Supreme Court Said About Domain Name 'Wordplay'
The U.S. Supreme Court’s opinion on trademark rights for the domain name <booking.com> has obviously generated a lot of discussion about the use of generic words in domain names, but one footnote from the Court that has attracted little attention is especially interesting: “Sometimes adding a generic term to a generic top-level domain results in wordplay (for example, ‘tennis.net’).”