The third quarterly issue of GigaLaw’s Domain Dispute Digest (Q3 2020) adds additional data to an already robust report about cybersquatting, with new statistics about the Uniform Rapid Suspension System (URS) in addition to the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP). It is available for download here.

In episode number 14 of the GigaLaw masterclass on domain name disputes, Doug Isenberg provides a top 10 list covering some of the most important topics that trademark owners should know about cybersquatting.

In episode number 13 of the GigaLaw masterclass on domain name disputes, attorney Doug Isenberg explains how various countries handle domain name disputes for their country code top-level domains (ccTLDs).

In episode number 12 of the GigaLaw masterclass on domain name disputes, attorney Doug Isenberg explains the Uniform Rapid Suspension System (URS) and how it differs from the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP).

In episode number 11 of GigaLaw’s YouTube masterclass on domain name disputes, attorney Doug Isenberg discuss where a trademark owner can file a complaint under the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP). As Doug explains in the video, there are six ICANN-approved UDRP service providers.

Doug Isenberg discusses how a trademark owner can file a complaint against an unknown registrant under the UDRP — such as when the whois record contains fake information, a registrant uses a privacy or proxy service, or the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) prevents a registrant from being identified.

In episode number 9 of GigaLaw’s YouTube masterclass on domain name disputes, Doug Isenberg discusses why and how a trademark owner can include multiple domain names in a single complaint under the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP).

In episode number 8 of GigaLaw’s YouTube masterclass on Domain Name Disputes, attorney Doug Isenberg discusses the "bad faith" requirement under the third part of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy's (UDRP) three-part test.

In episode number 7 of my YouTube masterclass on Domain Name Disputes, Doug Isenberg discusses the "rights or legitimate interests" requirement under the second part of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy's (UDRP) three-part test.

In episode number 6 of my YouTube masterclass on Domain Name Disputes, I discuss the "identical or confusingly similar" requirement of the first part of the three-part test under the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP). This requires a complainant to prove that the domain name at issue is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which it has rights.